Paper detail

A brief history of algebraic logic from neat embeddings to rainbow constructions

We take a long magical tour in algebraic logic, starting from classical results on neat embeddings due to Henkin, Monk and Tarski, all the way to recent results in algebraic logic using so--called rainbow constructions invented by Hirsch and Hodkinson. Highlighting the connections with graph theory, model theory, and finite combinatorics, this article aspires to present topics of broad interest in a way that is hopefully accessible to a large audience. The paper has a survey character but it contains new approaches to old ones. We aspire to make our survey fairly comprehensive, at least in so far as Tarskian algebraic logic, specifically, the theory of cylindric algebras, is concerned. Other topics, such as abstract algebraic logic, modal logic and the so--called (central) finitizability problem in algebraic logic will be dealt with; the last in some detail. Rainbow constructions are used to solve problems adressing classes of cylindric--like algebras consisting of algebras having a neat embedding property. The hitherto obtained results generalize seminal results of Hirsch and Hodkinson on non--atom canonicity, non--first order definabiity and non--finite axiomatizability, proved for classes of representable cylindric algebras of finite dimension$>2$. We show that such results remain valid for cylindric algebras possesing relativized {\it clique guarded} representations that are {\it only locally} well behaved. The paper is written in a way that makes it accessible to non--specialists curious about the state of the art in Tarskian algebraic logic. Reaching the boundaries of current research, the paper also aspires to be informative to the practitioner, and even more, stimulates her/him to carry on further research in main stream algebraic logic.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.