Paper detail

A Bridge between Bilevel Programs and Nash Games

We study connections between optimistic bilevel programming problems and Generalized Nash Equilibrium Problems (GNEP)s. We remark that, when addressing bilevel problems, we consider the general case in which the lower level program is not assumed to have a unique solution. Inspired by the optimal value approach, we propose a new GNEP model that is closely related to the bilevel program. We provide a complete analysis of the relationship between the "vertical" bilevel problem and the corresponding "horizontal" (one-level) GNEP model. We define classes of problems for which solutions of the bilevel program can be computed by finding equilibria of the GNEP. We develop a simple algorithm, which turns out to be globally convergent, for the solution of classes of our GNEP; we study how it is then possible to recover a solution of the bilevel problem from the computed equilibrium. Numerical experience shows the effectiveness of our approach, even when addressing big nonlinear bilevel problems.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.