Paper detail

A Bregman inertial forward-reflected-backward method for nonconvex minimization

We propose a Bregman inertial forward-reflected-backward (BiFRB) method for nonconvex composite problems. Our analysis relies on a novel approach that imposes general conditions on implicit merit function parameters, which yields a stepsize condition that is independent of inertial parameters. In turn, a question of Malitsky and Tam regarding whether FRB can be equipped with a Nesterov-type acceleration is resolved. Assuming the generalized concave Kurdyka-Łojasiewicz property of a quadratic regularization of the objective, we obtain sequential convergence of BiFRB, as well as convergence rates on both the function value and actual sequence. We also present formulae for the Bregman subproblem, supplementing not only BiFRB but also the work of Boţ-Csetnek-László and Boţ-Csetnek. Numerical simulations are conducted to evaluate the performance of our proposed algorithm.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.