Paper detail

A Bounded Linear Extension Operator for $L^{2,p}(\R^2)$

For a finite $E \subset \R^2$, $f:E \rightarrow \R$, and $p>2$, we produce a continuous $F:\R^2 \rightarrow \R$ depending linearly on $f$, taking the same values as $f$ on $E$, and with $L^{2,p}(\R^2)$ semi-norm minimal up to a factor $C=C(p)$. This solves the Whitney extension problem for the Sobolev space $L^{2,p}(\R^2)$. A standard method for solving extension problems is to find a collection of local extensions, each defined on a small square, which if chosen to be mutually consistent can be patched together to form a global extension defined on the entire plane. For Sobolev spaces the standard form of consistency is not applicable due to the (generically) non-local structure of the trace norm. In this paper, we define a new notion of consistency among local Sobolev extensions and apply it toward constructing a bounded linear extension operator. Our methods generalize to produce similar results for the $n$-dimensional case, and may be applicable toward understanding higher smoothness Sobolev extension problems.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.