Paper detail

A boundary-penalized isogeometric analysis for second-order hyperbolic equations

Explicit time-marching schemes are popular for solving time-dependent partial differential equations; one of the biggest challenges these methods suffer is increasing the critical time-marching step size that guarantees numerical stability. In general, there are two ways to increase the critical step size. One is to reduce the stiffness of the spatially discretized system, while the other is to design time-marching schemes with larger stability regions. In this paper, we focus on the recently proposed explicit generalized-$α$ method for second-order hyperbolic equations and increase the critical step size by reducing the stiffness of the isogeometric-discretized system. In particular, we apply boundary penalization to lessen the system's stiffness. For $p$-th order $C^{p-1}$ isogeometric elements, we show numerically that the critical step size increases by a factor of $\sqrt{\frac{p^2-3p+6}{4}}$, which indicates the advantages of using the proposed method, especially for high-order elements. Various examples in one, two, and three dimensions validate the performance of the proposed technique.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.