Paper detail

A bound on the codimensions of a PI-algebra using group geometry

In this note we draw a connection between noncommutative algebra and geometric group theory. Specifically, we ask whether it is possible to bound the sequence of codimensions for an associative PI-algebra using techniques from geometric group theory. The classic and best known bound on codimension growth was derived by finding a particularly nice spanning set for the multilinear polynomials of degree n inside the free algebra. This spanning set corresponds to permutations in the symmetric group which are so-called d-good, where d is the degree of an identity satisfied by the algebra. The motivation for our question comes from the fact that there is an obvious relationship between the word metric on the symmetric group and the property of being d-good. We answer in the affirmative, by finding a spanning set that corresponds to permutations which are large with respect to the word metric. We provide an explicit algorithm and formula for calculating the size of the resulting bound, and demonstrate that it is asymptotically worse than the classic one.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.