Paper detail

A bond counting model for accurate prediction of lattice parameter of bcc solid solution alloys

Lattice Parameter is an important material feature in High Entropy Alloy (HEA) Design. Vegards Law is typically used to estimate lattice parameters but is often inaccurate for metal alloys due to an inability to account for charge transfer which can affect atomic volumes. The present study used ab initio simulation to calculate bond lengths between atoms of dissimilar elements in B2 intermetallic compounds which was then combined with a bond counting model to produce a model to estimate the lattice parameters of Refractory BCC HEAS. The model was tested using a supercell method which modeled various random solid solution HEAs. The proposed model produced lattice parameters with superior accuracy to Vegards Law without the need for large DFT calculations or fitting parameters. The proposed model had a root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.006 Angstroms which is half that of Vegards Law RMSE (0.012 Angstrom).

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.