Paper detail

A bloated FM-index reducing the number of cache misses during the search

The FM-index is a well-known compressed full-text index, based on the Burrows-Wheeler transform (BWT). During a pattern search, the BWT sequence is accessed at "random" locations, which is cache-unfriendly. In this paper, we are interested in speeding up the FM-index by working on $q$-grams rather than individual characters, at the cost of using more space. The first presented variant is related to an inverted index on $q$-grams, yet the occurrence lists in our solution are in the sorted suffix order rather than text order in a traditional inverted index. This variant obtains $O(m/|CL| + \log n \log m)$ cache misses in the worst case, where $n$ and $m$ are the text and pattern lengths, respectively, and $|CL|$ is the CPU cache line size, in symbols (typically 64 in modern hardware). This index is often several times faster than the fastest known FM-indexes (especially for long patterns), yet the space requirements are enormous, $O(n\log^2 n)$ bits in theory and about $80n$-$95n$ bytes in practice. For this reason, we dub our approach FM-bloated. The second presented variant requires $O(n\log n)$ bits of space.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.