Paper detail

A Bivariate Invariance Principle

A notable result from analysis of Boolean functions is the Basic Invariance Principle (BIP), a quantitative nonlinear generalization of the Central Limit Theorem for multilinear polynomials. We present a generalization of the BIP for bivariate multilinear polynomials, i.e., polynomials over two n-length sequences of random variables. This bivariate invariance principle arises from an iterative application of the BIP to bound the error in replacing each of the two input sequences. In order to prove this invariance principle, we first derive a version of the BIP for random multilinear polynomials, i.e., polynomials whose coefficients are random variables. As a benchmark, we also state a naive bivariate invariance principle which treats the two input sequences as one and directly applies the BIP. Neither principle is universally stronger than the other, but we do show that for a notable class of bivariate functions, which we term separable functions, our subtler principle is exponentially tighter than the naive benchmark.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.