Paper detail

A birational Nevanlinna constant and its consequences

The purpose of this paper is to modify the notion of the Nevanlinna constant $\operatorname{Nev}(D)$, recently introduced by the first author, for an effective Cartier divisor on a projective variety $X$. The modified notion is called the birational Nevanlinna constant and is denoted by $\operatorname{Nev}_{\text{bir}}(D)$. By computing $\operatorname{Nev}_{\text{bir}}(D)$ using the filtration constructed by Autissier in 2011, we establish a general result (see the General Theorem in the Introduction), in both the arithmetic and complex cases, which extends to general divisors the 2008 results of Evertse and Ferretti and the 2009 results of the first author. The notion $\operatorname{Nev}_{\text{bir}}(D)$ is originally defined in terms of Weil functions for use in applications, and it is proved later in this paper that it can be defined in terms of local effectivity of Cartier divisors after taking a proper birational lifting. In the last two sections, we use the notion $\operatorname{Nev}_{\text{bir}}(D)$ to recover the proof of an example of Faltings from his 2002 Baker's Garden article.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.