Paper detail

A Biomedical Pipeline to Detect Clinical and Non-Clinical Named Entities

There are a few challenges related to the task of biomedical named entity recognition, which are: the existing methods consider a fewer number of biomedical entities (e.g., disease, symptom, proteins, genes); and these methods do not consider the social determinants of health (age, gender, employment, race), which are the non-medical factors related to patients' health. We propose a machine learning pipeline that improves on previous efforts in the following ways: first, it recognizes many biomedical entity types other than the standard ones; second, it considers non-clinical factors related to patient's health. This pipeline also consists of stages, such as preprocessing, tokenization, mapping embedding lookup and named entity recognition task to extract biomedical named entities from the free texts. We present a new dataset that we prepare by curating the COVID-19 case reports. The proposed approach outperforms the baseline methods on five benchmark datasets with macro-and micro-average F1 scores around 90, as well as our dataset with a macro-and micro-average F1 score of 95.25 and 93.18 respectively.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.