Paper detail

A bijection between Tamari intervals and extended fighting fish

We introduce extended fighting fish as branching surfaces that can also be seen as walks in the quarter plane defined by simple rewriting rules. The main result we present in the article is a direct bijection between extended fighting fish and intervals of the Tamari lattice that exchanges multiple natural statistics. The model includes the recently introduced fighting fish of (Duchi, Guerrini, Rinaldi, Schaeffer 2017) that were shown to be equinumerated with synchronized Tamari intervals. Using the dual surface/walk points of view on extended fighting fish, we show that the area statistics on these fish corresponds to the distance statistics (or maximal length of a chain) in Tamari invervals. We also show that the average area of a uniform random extended fighting fish of size $n$, and hence the average distance over the set of Tamari intervals of size $n$, is of order $n^{5/4}$, in accordance with earlier result for the subclass fighting fish.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.