Paper detail

A better lower bound for Lower-Left Anchored Rectangle Packing

Given any set of points $S$ in the unit square that contains the origin, does a set of axis aligned rectangles, one for each point in $S$, exist, such that each of them has a point in $S$ as its lower-left corner, they are pairwise interior disjoint, and the total area that they cover is at least 1/2? This question is also known as Freedman's conjecture (conjecturing that such a set of rectangles does exist) and has been open since Allen Freedman posed it in 1969. In this paper, we improve the best known lower bound on the total area that can be covered from 0.09121 to 0.1039. Although this step is small, we introduce new insights that push the limits of this analysis. Our lower bound uses a greedy algorithm with a particular order of the points in $S$. Therefore, it also implies that this greedy algorithm achieves an approximation ratio of 0.1039. We complement the result with an upper bound of 3/4 on the approximation ratio for a natural class of greedy algorithms that includes the one that achieves the lower bound.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.