Paper detail

A benchmark for the Bayesian inversion of coefficients in partial differential equations

Bayesian methods have been widely used in the last two decades to infer statistical properties of spatially variable coefficients in partial differential equations from measurements of the solutions of these equations. Yet, in many cases the number of variables used to parameterize these coefficients is large, and obtaining meaningful statistics of their values is difficult using simple sampling methods such as the basic Metropolis-Hastings (MH) algorithm -- in particular if the inverse problem is ill-conditioned or ill-posed. As a consequence, many advanced sampling methods have been described in the literature that converge faster than MH, for example by exploiting hierarchies of statistical models or hierarchies of discretizations of the underlying differential equation. At the same time, it remains difficult for the reader of the literature to quantify the advantages of these algorithms because there is no commonly used benchmark. This paper presents a benchmark Bayesian inverse problem -- namely, the determination of a spatially-variable coefficient, discretized by 64 values, in a Poisson equation, based on point measurements of the solution -- that fills the gap between widely used simple test cases (such as superpositions of Gaussians) and real applications that are difficult to replicate for developers of sampling algorithms. We provide a complete description of the test case, and provide an open source implementation that can serve as the basis for further experiments. We have also computed $2\times 10^{11}$ samples, at a cost of some 30 CPU years, of the posterior probability distribution from which we have generated detailed and accurate statistics against which other sampling algorithms can be tested.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.