Paper detail

A Beginner's Guide to Counting Spanning Trees in a Graph

(DRAFT VERSION) In this article we present a proof of the famous Kirchoff's Matrix-Tree theorem, which relates the number of spanning trees in a connected graph with the cofactors (and eigenvalues) of its combinatorial Laplacian matrix. This is a 165 year old result in graph theory and the proof is conceptually simple. However, the elegance of this result is it connects many apparently unrelated concepts in linear algebra and graph theory. Our motivation behind this work was to make the proof accessible to anyone with beginner\slash intermediate grasp of linear algebra. Therefore in this paper we present proof of every single argument leading to the final result. For example, we prove the elementary properties of determinants, relationship between the roots of characteristic polynomial (that is, eigenvalues) and the minors, the Cauchy-Binet formula, the Laplace expansion of determinant, etc.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.