Paper detail

A Bayesian technique for improving the sensitivity of the atmospheric neutrino L/E analysis

This paper outlines a method for improving the precision of atmospheric neutrino oscillation measurements. One experimental signature for these oscillations is an observed deficit in the rate of $ν_μ$ charged-current interactions with an oscillatory dependence on $L_ν/E_ν$, where $L_ν$ is the neutrino propagation distance, and $E_ν$ is the neutrino energy. For contained-vertex atmospheric neutrino interactions, the $L_ν/E_ν$ resolution varies significantly from event to event. The precision of the oscillation measurement can be improved by incorporating information on $L_ν/E_ν$ resolution into the oscillation analysis. In the analysis presented here, a Bayesian technique is used to estimate the $L_ν/E_ν$ resolution of observed atmospheric neutrinos on an event-by-event basis. By separating the events into bins of $L_ν/E_ν$ resolution in the oscillation analysis, a significant improvement in oscillation sensitivity can be achieved.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.