Paper detail

A Bayesian Population Model for the Observed Dust Attenuation in Galaxies

Dust plays a pivotal role in determining the observed spectral energy distribution (SED) of galaxies. Yet our understanding of dust attenuation is limited and our observations suffer from the dust-metallicity-age degeneracy in SED fitting (single galaxies), large individual variances (ensemble measurements), and the difficulty in properly dealing with uncertainties (statistical considerations). In this study, we create a population Bayesian model to rigorously account for correlated variables and non-Gaussian error distributions and demonstrate the improvement over a simple Bayesian model. We employ a flexible 5-D linear interpolation model for the parameters that control dust attenuation curves as a function of stellar mass, star formation rate (SFR), metallicity, redshift, and inclination. Our setup allows us to determine the complex relationships between dust attenuation and these galaxy properties simultaneously. Using Prospector fits of nearly 30,000 3D-HST galaxies, we find that the attenuation slope ($n$) flattens with increasing optical depth ($τ$), though less so than in previous studies. $τ$ increases strongly with SFR, though when $\log~{\rm SFR}\lesssim 0$, $τ$ remains roughly constant over a wide range of stellar masses. Edge-on galaxies tend to have larger $τ$ than face-on galaxies, but only for $\log~M_*\gtrsim 10$, reflecting the lack of triaxiality for low-mass galaxies. Redshift evolution of dust attenuation is strongest for low-mass, low-SFR galaxies, with higher optical depths but flatter curves at high redshift. Finally, $n$ has a complex relationship with stellar mass, highlighting the intricacies of the star-dust geometry. We have publicly released software (https://github.com/Astropianist/DustE) for users to access our population model.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.