Paper detail

A Bayesian method for estimating gene-level polygenicity under the framework of transcriptome-wide association study

Polygnicity refers to the phenomenon that multiple genetic variants have a non-zero effect on a complex trait. It is defined as the proportion of genetic variants that have a nonzero effect on the trait. Evaluation of polygenicity can provide valuable insights into the genetic architecture of the trait. Several recent works have attempted to estimate polygenicity at the SNP level. However, evaluating polygenicity at the gene level can be biologically more meaningful. We propose the notion of gene-level polygenicity, defined as the proportion of genes having a non-zero effect on the trait under the framework of transcriptome-wide association study. We introduce a Bayesian approach polygene to estimate this quantity for a trait. The method is based on spike and slab prior and simultaneously provides an optimal subset of non-null genes. Our simulation study shows that polygene efficiently estimates gene-level polygenicity. The method produces downward bias for small choices of trait heritability due to a non-null gene, which diminishes rapidly with an increase in the GWAS sample size. While identifying the optimal subset of non-null genes, polygene offers a high level of specificity and an overall good level of sensitivity -- the sensitivity increases as the sample size of the reference panel expression and GWAS data increase. We applied the method to seven phenotypes in the UK Biobank, integrating expression data. We find height to be most polygenic and asthma to be the least polygenic. Our analysis suggests that both HDL and triglycerides are more polygenic than LDL.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.