Paper detail

A Bayesian Approach to the Vertical Structure of the Disk of the Milky Way

This work investigates the vertical profile of the stars in the disk of the Milky Way. The models investigated are of the form $sech^{2/n}(nz/(2H))$ where, setting $α= 2/n$, the three functions of the sequence $α= 0,1,2$ correspond to exponential, $sech$, $sech^2$ functions. We consider symmetric models and asymmetric models, above and below the plane. The study uses the large sample of K and M stars of Ferguson et al. (2017) and applies the methods of Bayesian model comparison to discriminate between the 6 models. Two inconsistencies in Ferguson et al. (2017), concerning the vertical height cut and the model continuity across the plane, are noted and addressed. We find that (1) in the Milky Way the symmetric disc models are decisively ruled out, with northern thin disc scale heights $\sim25\%$ larger than southern, (2) there is moderate evidence for the exponential and $sech$ models over the $sech^2$ model, though a sample extending further into the Galactic mid-plane is needed to strengthen this result, (3) the photometric distances used by Ferguson et al. underestimate the GAIA distances by a factor of roughly 1.16, and (4) the increase of scale height with Galactic latitude observed by Ferguson et al. is due to incorrect cuts to the data.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.