Paper detail

A Bayesian Approach to Gravitational Lens Model Selection, SF2A proceeding

Over the past decade advancements in the understanding of several astrophysical phenomena have allowed us to infer a concordance cosmological model that successfully accounts for most of the observations of our universe. This has opened up the way to studies that aim to better determine the constants of the model and confront its predictions with those of competing scenarios. Here, we use strong gravitational lenses as cosmological probes. Strong lensing, as opposed to weak lensing, produces multiple images of a single source. Extracting cosmologically relevant information requires accurate modeling of the lens mass distribution, the latter being a galaxy or a cluster. To this purpose a variety of models are available, but it is hard to distinguish between them, as the choice is mostly guided by the quality of the fit to the data without accounting for the number of additional parameters introduced. However, this is a model selection problem rather than one of parameter fitting that we address in the Bayesian framework. Using simple test cases, we show that the assumption of more complicate lens models may not be justified given the level of accuracy of the data.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.