Paper detail

A Bayesian algorithm for model selection applied to caustic-crossing binary-lens microlensing events

We present a full Bayesian algorithm designed to perform automated searches of the parameter space of caustic-crossing binary-lens microlensing events. This builds on previous work implementing priors derived from Galactic models and geometrical considerations. The geometrical structure of the priors divides the parameter space into well-defined boxes that we explore with multiple Monte Carlo Markov Chains. We outline our Bayesian framework and test our automated search scheme using two data sets: a synthetic lightcurve, and the observations of OGLE-2007-BLG-472 that we analysed in previous work. For the synthetic data, we recover the input parameters. For OGLE-2007-BLG-472 we find that while χ^2 is minimised for a planetary mass-ratio model with extremely long timescale, the introduction of priors and minimisation of BIC, rather than χ^2, favours a more plausible lens model, a binary star with components of 0.78 and 0.11 M_Sun at a distance of 6.3 kpc, compared to our previous result of 1.50 and 0.12 M_Sun at a distance of 1 kpc.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.