Paper detail

A basis of algebraic de Rham cohomology of complete intersections over a characteristic zero field

Let $\Bbbk$ be a field of characteristic 0. Let $X$ be a smooth complete intersection over $k$ of dimension $n-k$ in the projective space $\mathbf{P}^n_{k}$, for given positive integers $n$ and $k$. When $k=\mathbb{C}$, Terasoma (\cite{Ter90}) and Konno (\cite{Ko91}) provided an explicit representative (in terms of differential forms) of a basis for the primitive middle-dimensional algebraic de Rham cohomology $H_{dR,\operatorname{prim}}^{n-k}(X;\mathbb{C})$. Later Dimca constructed another explicit representative of a basis of $H_{dR,\operatorname{prim}}^{n-k}(X;\mathbb{C})$ in \cite{Dim95}. Moreover, he proved that his representative gives the same cohomology class as the previous representative of Terasoma and Konno. The goal of this article is to examine the above two different approaches without assuming that $k=\mathbb{C}$ and provide a similar comparison result for any field $k$. Dimca's argument depends heavily on the condition $k=\mathbb{C}$ and our idea is to find appropriate Cech-de Rham complexes and spectral sequences corresponding to those two approaches, which work without restrictions on $k$.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.