Paper detail

(a,b)-rectangle patterns in permutations and words

In this paper, we introduce the notion of a $(a,b)$-rectangle pattern on permutations that not only generalizes the notion of successive elements (bonds) in permutations, but is also related to mesh patterns introduced recently by Brändén and Claesson. We call the $(k,k)$-rectangle pattern the $k$-box pattern. To provide an enumeration result on the maximum number of occurrences of the 1-box pattern, we establish an enumerative result on pattern-avoiding signed permutations. Further, we extend the notion of $(k,\ell)$-rectangle patterns to words and binary matrices, and provide distribution of $(1,\ell)$-rectangle patterns on words; explicit formulas are given for up to 7 letter alphabets where $\ell \in \{1,2\}$, while obtaining distributions for larger alphabets depends on inverting a matrix we provide. We also provide similar results for the distribution of bonds over words. As a corollary to our studies we confirm a conjecture of Mathar on the number of "stable LEGO walls" of width 7 as well as prove three conjectures due to Hardin and a conjecture due to Barker. We also enumerate two sequences published by Hardin in the On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.