Paper detail

A "Safe Kernel" Approach for Resilient Multi-Dimensional Consensus

This paper considers the resilient multi-dimensional consensus problem in networked systems, where some of the agents might be malicious (or faulty). We propose a multi-dimensional consensus algorithm, where at each time step each healthy agent computes a "safe kernel" based on the information from its neighbors, and modifies its own state towards a point inside the kernel. Assuming that the number of malicious agents is locally (or globally) upper bounded, sufficient conditions on the network topology are presented to guarantee that the benign agents exponentially reach an agreement within the convex hull of their initial states, regardless of the actions of the misbehaving ones. It is also revealed that the graph connectivity and robustness required to achieve the resilient consensus increases linearly with respect to the dimension of the agents' state, indicating the existence of a trade-off between the low communication cost and system security. Numerical examples are provided in the end to validate the theoretical results.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.