Paper detail

A "no-drift" runaway pile-up of pebbles in protoplanetary disks II. Characteristics of the resulting planetesimal belt

Forming planetesimals from pebbles is a major challenge in our current understanding of planet formation. In a protoplanetary disk, pebbles drift inward near the disk midplane via gas drag and they may enter a dead zone. In this context, we identified that the backreaction of the drag of pebbles onto the gas could lead to a runaway pile-up of pebbles, the so-called no-drift mechanism. We improve upon the previous study of the no-drift mechanism by investigating the nature and characteristics of the resultant planetesimal belt. We performed 1D diffusion-advection simulations of drifting pebbles in the outer region of a dead zone by including the backreaction to the radial drift of pebbles and including planetesimal formation via the streaming instability. We considered the parameters that regulate gas accretion and vertical stirring of pebbles in the disk midplane. In this study, the pebble-to-gas mass flux ($F_{\rm p/g}$) was fixed as a parameter. We find that planetesimals initially form within a narrow ring whose width expands as accumulating pebbles radially diffuse over time. The system finally reaches a steady-state where the width of the planetesimal belt no longer changes. A non-negligible total mass of planetesimals (more than one Earth mass) is formed for a disk having $F_{\rm p/g} \gtrsim 0.1$ for more than $\sim 10-100$ kyr with nominal parameters: a gas mass flux of $\gtrsim10^{-8} {\rm M}_\oplus$/yr, $τ_{\rm s} \simeq 0.01-0.1$, $α_{\rm mid} \lesssim 10^{-4}$, and $α_{\rm acc} \simeq 10^{-3}-10^{-2}$ at $r \lesssim 10$ au, where $r$, $τ_{\rm s}$, $α_{\rm mid}$, and $α_{\rm acc}$ are the heliocentric distance, the Stokes number, and the parameters in a dead zone controlling the efficiencies of vertical turbulent diffusion of pebbles (i.e., scale height of pebbles) and gas accretion of the $α$-disk (i.e., gas surface density), respectively.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.