Paper detail

A 3% Determination of $H_0$ at Intermediate Redshifts

Recent determinations of the Hubble constant, H_0, at extremely low and very high redshifts based on the cosmic distance ladder (grounded with trigonometric parallaxes) and a cosmological model (applied to Planck 2013 data) respectively, are revealing an intriguing discrepancy (nearly 9% or 2.4sigma) that is challenging astronomers and theoretical cosmologists. In order to shed some light on this problem, here we discuss a new determination of H_0 at intermediate redshifts (z ~ 1), using the following four cosmic probes: (i) measurements of the angular diameter distances (ADD) for galaxy clusters based on the combination of Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect and X-ray data (0.14 < z < 0.89$), (ii) the inferred ages of old high redshift galaxies (OHRG) (0.62 < z < 1.70), (iii) measurements of the Hubble parameter H(z) (0.1 < z < 1.8), and (iv) the baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) signature (z=0.35). In our analysis, assuming a flat LCDM cosmology and considering statistical plus systematic errors we obtain H_0 = 74.1^{+2.2}_{-2.2} km/s.Mpc (1sigma) which is a 3% determination of the Hubble constant at intermediate redshifts. We stress that each individual test adopted here has error bars larger than the ones appearing in the calibration of the extragalactic distance ladder. However, the remarkable complementarity among the four tests works efficiently in reducing greatly the possible degeneracy on the space parameter (Omega_m,h) ultimately providing a value of H_0 that is in excellent agreement with the determination using recessional velocities and distances to nearby objects.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.