Paper detail

A 1.46-2.48 $μ$m Spectroscopic Atlas of a T6 Dwarf (1060 K) Atmosphere with IGRINS: First Detections of H$_2$S and H$_2$, and Verification of H$_2$O, CH$_4$, and NH$_3$ Line Lists

We present Gemini South/IGRINS observations of the 1060 K T6 dwarf 2MASS J08173001$-$6155158 with unprecedented resolution ($R\equivλ/Δλ=45\,000$) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR > 200) for a late-type T dwarf. We use this benchmark observation to test the reliability of molecular line lists used up-to-date atmospheric models. We determine which spectroscopic regions should be used to estimate the parameters of cold brown dwarfs and, by extension, exoplanets. We present a detailed spectroscopic atlas with molecular identifications across the $H$ and $K$ bands of the near-infrared. We find that water (H$_2$O) line lists are overall reliable. We find the most discrepancies amongst older methane (CH$_4$) line lists, and that the most up-to-date CH$_4$ line lists correct many of these issues. We identify individual ammonia (NH$_3$) lines, a hydrogen sulfide (H$_2$S) feature at 1.5900 $μ$m, and a molecular hydrogen (H$_2$) feature at 2.1218 $μ$m. These are the first unambiguous detections of H$_2$S and H$_2$ absorption features in an extra-solar atmosphere. With the H$_2$ detection, we place an upper limit on the atmospheric dust concentration of this T6 dwarf: at least 500 times less than the interstellar value, implying that the atmosphere is effectively dust-free. We additionally identify several features that do not appear in the model spectra. Our assessment of the line lists is valuable for atmospheric model applications to high-dispersion, low-SNR, high-background spectra, such as an exoplanet around a star. We demonstrate a significant enhancement in the detection of the CH$_4$ absorption signal in this T6 dwarf with the most up-to-date line lists.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.