Paper detail

870 um observations of evolved stars with LABOCA

During their evolution, Asymptotic Giant Branch (AGB) stars experience a high mass-loss which leads to the formation of a Circumstellar Envelope (CSE) of dust and gas. The mass-loss process is the most important phenomenon during this evolutionary stage. In order to understand it, it is important to study the physical parameters of the CSE. The emission of the CSE in the (sub)millimetre range is dominated by the dust continuum. This means that (sub)millimetre observations are a key tool in tracing the dust and improving our knowledge of the mass-loss process. In this paper we analyse new sub-millimetre observations of 9 evolved stars in order to constrain the CSE physical parameters. The data were taken by the new APEX bolometer LABoCa. The fluxes at 870 um are derived and the extended emission is investigated. We compute the spectral energy distribution (SEDs) using a 1D radiative transfer code, DUSTY which we compared to literature data. Grain properties are calculated using both spherical grains distribution and a Continuous Distribution of Ellipsoids (CDE) and a comparison between the two is drawn. Synthetic surface brightness maps have been derived from the modelling and were compared to the LABoCa brightness maps. We detected the presence of extended emission around four stars. Physical parameters of the circumstellar envelope are derived from SED modelling, such as the dust chemical composition, the dust condensation temperature and the total mass of the envelope. It proves difficult however to fit the SED and the intensity profile simultaneously.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.