Paper detail

3D radiative transfer simulations of Eta Carinae's inner colliding winds - II: Ionization structure of helium at periastron

Spectral observations of the massive colliding wind binary Eta Carinae show phase-dependent variations, in intensity and velocity, of numerous helium emission and absorption lines throughout the entire 5.54-year orbit. Approaching periastron, the 3D structure of the wind-wind interaction region (WWIR) gets highly distorted due to the eccentric ($e \sim 0.9$) binary orbit. The secondary star ($η_{\mathrm{B}}$) at these phases is located deep within the primary's dense wind photosphere. The combination of these effects is thought to be the cause of the particularly interesting features observed in the helium lines at periastron. We perform 3D radiative transfer simulations of $η$ Car's interacting winds at periastron. Using the SimpleX radiative transfer algorithm, we post-process output from 3D smoothed particle hydrodynamic simulations of the inner 150 au of the $η$ Car system for two different primary star mass-loss rates ($\dot{M}_{η_{\mathrm{A}}}$). Using previous results from simulations at apastron as a guide for the initial conditions, we compute 3D helium ionization maps. We find that, for higher $\dot{M}_{η_{\mathrm{A}}}$, $η_{\mathrm{B}}$ He$^{0+}$-ionizing photons are not able to penetrate into the pre-shock primary wind. He$^{+}$ due to $η_{\mathrm{B}}$ is only present in a thin layer along the leading arm of the WWIR and in a small region close to the stars. Lowering $\dot{M}_{η_{\mathrm{A}}}$ allows $η_{\mathrm{B}}$'s ionizing photons to reach the expanding unshocked secondary wind on the apastron side of the system, and create a low fraction of He$^{+}$ in the pre-shock primary wind. With apastron on our side of the system, our results are qualitatively consistent with the observed variations in strength and radial velocity of $η$ Car's helium emission and absorption lines, which helps better constrain the regions where these lines arise.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.