Paper detail

3D Protein Structure Predicted from Sequence

The evolutionary trajectory of a protein through sequence space is constrained by function and three-dimensional (3D) structure. Residues in spatial proximity tend to co-evolve, yet attempts to invert the evolutionary record to identify these constraints and use them to computationally fold proteins have so far been unsuccessful. Here, we show that co-variation of residue pairs, observed in a large protein family, provides sufficient information to determine 3D protein structure. Using a data-constrained maximum entropy model of the multiple sequence alignment, we identify pairs of statistically coupled residue positions which are expected to be close in the protein fold, termed contacts inferred from evolutionary information (EICs). To assess the amount of information about the protein fold contained in these coupled pairs, we evaluate the accuracy of predicted 3D structures for proteins of 50-260 residues, from 15 diverse protein families, including a G-protein coupled receptor. These structure predictions are de novo, i.e., they do not use homology modeling or sequence-similar fragments from known structures. The resulting low Cα-RMSD error range of 2.7-5.1Å, over at least 75% of the protein, indicates the potential for predicting essentially correct 3D structures for the thousands of protein families that have no known structure, provided they include a sufficiently large number of divergent sample sequences. With the current enormous growth in sequence information based on new sequencing technology, this opens the door to a comprehensive survey of protein 3D structures, including many not currently accessible to the experimental methods of structural genomics. This advance has potential applications in many biological contexts, such as synthetic biology, identification of functional sites in proteins and interpretation of the functional impact of genetic variants.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.