Paper detail

3D hydrodynamical CO5BOLD model atmospheres of late-type giants: chemical abundances from molecular lines

We investigate the influence of convection on the formation of molecular spectral lines in the atmospheres of late-type giants. For this purpose we use the 3D hydrodynamical CO5BOLD and classical 1D LHD stellar atmosphere codes and synthesize a number of fictitious lines belonging to a number of astrophysically relevant molecules, C2, CH, CN, CO, NH, OH. We find that differences between the abundances obtained from molecular lines using the 3D and 1D model atmospheres are generally small at [M/H]=0.0, but they quickly increase at sub-solar metallicities where for certain molecules they may reach -2.0 dex. The 3D-1D abundance differences show a significant dependence on the spectral line parameters, such as wavelength and excitation potential. Our comparison, therefore, reveals a complex interplay between the spectral line formation and convection that can not be properly accounted for with the classical 1D model atmospheres.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.