Paper detail

3D Correspondence Grouping with Compatibility Features

We present a simple yet effective method for 3D correspondence grouping. The objective is to accurately classify initial correspondences obtained by matching local geometric descriptors into inliers and outliers. Although the spatial distribution of correspondences is irregular, inliers are expected to be geometrically compatible with each other. Based on such observation, we propose a novel representation for 3D correspondences, dubbed compatibility feature (CF), to describe the consistencies within inliers and inconsistencies within outliers. CF consists of top-ranked compatibility scores of a candidate to other correspondences, which purely relies on robust and rotation-invariant geometric constraints. We then formulate the grouping problem as a classification problem for CF features, which is accomplished via a simple multilayer perceptron (MLP) network. Comparisons with nine state-of-the-art methods on four benchmarks demonstrate that: 1) CF is distinctive, robust, and rotation-invariant; 2) our CF-based method achieves the best overall performance and holds good generalization ability.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.