Paper detail

"Piaf" vs "Adele": classifying encyclopedic queries using automatically labeled training data

Encyclopedic queries express the intent of obtaining information typically available in encyclopedias, such as biographical, geographical or historical facts. In this paper, we train a classifier for detecting the encyclopedic intent of web queries. For training such a classifier, we automatically label training data from raw query logs. We use click-through data to select positive examples of encyclopedic queries as those queries that mostly lead to Wikipedia articles. We investigated a large set of features that can be generated to describe the input query. These features include both term-specific patterns as well as query projections on knowledge bases items (e.g. Freebase). Results show that using these feature sets it is possible to achieve an F1 score above 87%, competing with a Google-based baseline, which uses a much wider set of signals to boost the ranking of Wikipedia for potential encyclopedic queries. The results also show that both query projections on Wikipedia article titles and Freebase entity match represent the most relevant groups of features. When the training set contains frequent positive examples (i.e rare queries are excluded) results tend to improve.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.