Paper detail

"Flat" broad line region and gamma-ray absorption in blazars

We study the impact of the geometry of the broad line region (BLR) on the expected absorption, through the γγ\rightarrow e^{\pm} process, of gamma rays produced in the relativistic jet of flat spectrum radio quasars (FSRQ). We consider "flat" (or "disky") BLR models, and use BLR spectra calculated with the photoionization code CLOUDY, already used to investigate the emission and the absorption of high-energy photons in FSRQ. We characterize the energy-dependent optical depth of the process, τ(E), for different accretion disk luminosities, aperture angles of the BLR (α, as measured from the equatorial plane), and initial injection eighths of the high-energy photons, $R_{\rm o}$. We study in particular how the change of these parameters influences the spectral break at GeV energies, predicted if the emission occurs within the BLR. We found a well defined relation between the break energy and the post-break slope, both uniquely determined by α. We finally find that even a rather disk-like BLR (α\sim 25^\circ) corresponds to important absorption (τ>1) of photons above few tens of GeV produced within the BLR. We therefore conclude that the VHE emission detected from FSRQs occurs beyond the BLR.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.