Paper detail

"Butterfly Effect" vs Chaos in Energy Futures Markets

In this paper we test for the sensitive dependence on initial conditions (the so called "butterfly effect") of energy futures time series (heating oil, natural gas), and thus the determinism of those series. This paper is distinguished from previous studies in the following points: first, we reread existent works in the literature on energy markets, enlightening the role of \emph{butterfly effect} in chaos definition (introduced by Devaney), using this definition to prevent us from misleading results about ostensible chaoticity of the price series. Second, we test for the time series for sensitive dependence on initial conditions, introducing a coefficient that describes the determinism rate of the series and that represents its reliability level (in percentage). The introduction of this reliability level is motivated by the fact that time series generated from stochastic systems also might show sensitive dependence on initial conditions. According to this perspective, the maximum reliability level obtained here is too low to be able to ensure that there is strong evidence of sensitive The maximum reliability level obtained here was been $\simeq 56\% $, too low to ensure strong evidence of sensitive dependence on initial conditions.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.