Paper detail

2mass/Hipparcos Extinctions and Distances in the Serpens - Aquila Region.IV. Error Propagation. Individual stars and mean values

We estimate errors from the application of the main sequence $(H-K)_0 \ vs. \ (J-H)_0$ and $(J-K)_0 \ vs. \ M_J$ relations on 2mass photometry to provide stellar extinctions and distances. The error propagation on individual stars in the Serpens -- Aquila star forming region is investigated. Results: errors on the $J-band$ extinction $σ_{A_J}$ are found in the range from 0.05 to 0.20 mag and peak at $\approx$0.1. For the absolute $J-band$ magnitudes the $σ_{M_J}$ range is found from 0.1 to 0.5 mag and the distribution has a pronounced maximum at $\approx$0.3 mag. Individual relative distance errors, $σ_{distance}/distance$, are found in the interval from 8$%$ to 25$%$ and peak at 15$%$. If cloud distances are identified with the location of a local maximum of the $A_J(median)/distance(median)$ variation the Serpens -- Aquila cloud may be at 203$\pm$7 pc. We propose that the median absolute deviation from the median of $A_J$ could be used as a cloud distance indicator

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.