Paper detail

2020 Global reassessment of the neutrino oscillation picture

We present an updated global fit of neutrino oscillation data in the simplest three-neutrino framework. In the present study we include up-to-date analyses from a number of experiments. Concerning the atmospheric and solar sectors, we give updated analyses of DeepCore and SNO data, respectively. We have also included the latest electron antineutrino data collected by the Daya Bay and RENO reactor experiments, and the long-baseline T2K and NO$ν$A measurements. These new analyses result in more accurate measurements of $θ_{13}$, $θ_{12}$, $Δm_{21}^2$ and $|Δm_{31}^2|$. The best fit value for the atmospheric angle $θ_{23}$ lies in the second octant, but first octant solutions remain allowed at $\sim2.4σ$. Regarding CP violation measurements, the preferred value of $δ$ we obtain is 1.08$π$ (1.58$π$) for normal (inverted) neutrino mass ordering. The global analysis prefers normal neutrino mass ordering with 2.5$σ$. This preference is milder than the one found in previous global analyses. The new results should be regarded as robust due to the agreement found between our Bayesian and frequentist approaches. Taking into account only oscillation data, there is a weak/moderate preference for the normal neutrino mass ordering of $2.00σ$. While adding neutrinoless double beta decay from the latest Gerda, CUORE and KamLAND-Zen results barely modifies this picture, cosmological measurements raise the preference to $2.68σ$ within a conservative approach. A more aggressive data set combination of cosmological observations leads to a similar preference, namely $2.70σ$. This very same cosmological data set provides $2σ$ upper limits on the total neutrino mass corresponding to $\sumν<0.12$ ($0.15$)~eV for normal (inverted) neutrino mass ordering.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.