Paper detail

$2 \rightarrow 2N$ scattering: Eikonalisation and the Page curve

In the spirit of studying the information paradox as a scattering problem, we pose and answer the following questions: i) What is the scattering amplitude for $N$ particles to emerge from a large black hole when two energetic particles are thrown into it? ii) How long would we have to wait to recover the information sent in? The answer to the second question has long been expected to be Page time, a quantity associated with the lifetime of the black hole. We answer the first by evaluating an infinite number of `ladder of ladders' Feynman diagrams to all orders in $M_{Pl}/M_{BH}$. Such processes can generically be calculated in effective field theory in the black hole eikonal phase where scattering energies satisfy $E M_{BH} \gg M^{2}_{Pl}$. Importantly, interactions are mediated by a fluctuating metric; a fixed geometry is insufficient to capture these effects. We find that the characteristic time spent by the particles in the scattering region (the so-called Eisenbud-Wigner time delay) is indeed Page time, confirming the long-standing expectation. This implies that the entropy of radiation continues to increase, after the particles are thrown in, until after Page time, when information begins to re-emerge.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.