Paper detail

1993 Superoutburst of LL Andromedae

We present time-resolved CCD photometry of LL And during its 1993 outburst. The observation revealed the presence of superhumps with a period of 0.05697(3) d. This period is one of the smallest among the hydrogen-rich dwarf novae. Although LL And has been proposed to be a WZ Sge-type dwarf nova based on its low outburst frequency, our new analysis indicates that the outburst amplitude (~5 mag) and outburst duration (9+/-2 d) are much smaller and shorter than in typical WZ Sge-type dwarf novae. We suspect that the unusual outburst properties of LL And might be explained by assuming a "leaky disk" in quiescence, which was originally proposed to explain the prototypical WZ Sge-type outbursts. By combination with the recent suggestion of the orbital period, the fractional superhump excess is found to be 3.5(1)%, which is unusually large for this short-period system. LL And may be an object filling the gap in the evolutionary track, which has recently been proposed to explain the unusual ultracompact binaries with an evolved mass donor.

preprint2003arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.