Paper detail

150 New transiting planet candidates from Kepler Q1-Q6 data

We have performed an extensive search for planet candidates in the publicly available Kepler Long Cadence data from quarters Q1 through Q6. The search method consists of initial de-trending of the data, applying the trend filtering algorithm, searching for transit signals with the Box Least Squares fitting method in three frequency domains, visual inspection of the potential transit candidates, and in-depth analysis of the shortlisted candidates. In this paper we present 150 new periodic planet candidates and 7 single transit events, 72 of which are in multiple systems. The periods of these planet candidates vary from $\sim$0.17\,day to $\sim$ 440\,day. 124 of the planet candidates have radii smaller than 3 \rearth. We recover 82.5% of the Batalha et al. (2012) KOI catalog. We also report 40 newly identified false positives---systems that look like transiting planets, but are probably due to blended eclipsing binaries. Our search improves the statistics in the short period and small planet radii parameter ranges.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.