Paper detail

1/f fluctuations of DNA temperature at thermal denaturation

We theoretically investigated the temperature fluctuations of DNA close to denaturation and observed a strong enhancement of these fluctuations at the critical temperature. Although in a much lower frequency range, such a sharp increase was also reported in the recent experimental work of Nagapriya et al [Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 038102 (2006)]. We showed that there is instead no enhancement of temperature fluctuations when the dissipation coefficient in Langevin equations is assumed to be larger than a few tens of ps-1, and pointed out the possible role of the solvent in real experiments. We sought for a possible correlation between the growth of large bubbles and the enhancement of temperature fluctuations but found no direct evidence thereof. Finally, we showed that neither the enhancement of fluctuations nor the 1/f dependence are observed at the scale of a single base pair, while these properties show up when summing the contributions of a large number of base pairs. We therefore conclude that both effects result from collective motions that are facilitated by the divergence of the correlation length at denaturation.

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.