Graph explorer

Tree indiscernibilities, revisited

We give definitions that distinguish between two notions of indiscernibility for a set $\{a_η\mid η\in \W\}$ that saw original use in \cite{sh90}, which we name \textit{$\s$-} and \textit{$\n$-indiscernibility}. Using these definitions and detailed proofs, we prove $\s$- and $\n$-modeling theorems and give applications of these theorems. In particular, we verify a step in the argument that TP is equivalent to TP$_1$ or TP$_2$ that has not seen explication in the literature. In the Appendix, we exposit the proofs of \citep[{App. 2.6, 2.7}]{sh90}, expanding on the details.

5 nodes4 linksoverview previewTree indiscernibilities, revisited
5 nodes4 links
Tree indiscernibilities, revisited5 visible / 5 total nodes / 7 links
Co-authorshipCo-authorshipCo-authorshipAuthorshipAuthorshipAuthorshipTopic signalWTree indiscernibilities, revisitedpreprint / 2013AByunghan KimResearcherAHyeung-Joon KimResearcherALynn ScowResearcherTmath.LO1661 works
PaperSignal 104 links

Tree indiscernibilities, revisited

preprint / 2013

Open