Graph explorer

Thinking about Archeoastronomy

I discuss various aspects of archeoastronomy concentrating on physical artifacts (i.e., not including ethno-archeoastronomy) focusing on the period that ended about 2000 years ago. I present examples of artifacts interpreted as showing the interest of humankind in understanding celestial phenomena and using these to synchronize calendars and predict future celestial and terrestrial events. I stress the difficulty of identifying with a high degree of confidence that these artifacts do indeed pertain to astronomy and caution against the over-interpretation of the finds as definite evidence. With these in mind, I point to artifacts that seem to indicate a human fascination with megalithic stone circles and megalithic alignments starting from at least 11000 BCE, and to other items presented as evidence for Neolithic astronomical interests dating to even 20000 BCE or even before. I discuss the geographical and temporal spread of megalithic sites associated with astronomical interpretations searching for synchronicity or for a possible single point of origin. A survey of a variety of artifacts indicates that the astronomical development in antiquity did not happen simultaneously at diffe

4 nodes3 linksoverview previewThinking about Archeoastronomy
4 nodes3 links
Thinking about Archeoastronomy4 visible / 4 total nodes / 3 links
AuthorshipTopic signalTopic signalWThinking about Archeoastronomypreprint / 2011ANoah BroschResearcherTastro-ph.IM4506 worksTphysics.hist-ph641 works
PaperSignal 103 links

Thinking about Archeoastronomy

preprint / 2011

Open