Graph explorer

The map equation

Many real-world networks are so large that we must simplify their structure before we can extract useful information about the systems they represent. As the tools for doing these simplifications proliferate within the network literature, researchers would benefit from some guidelines about which of the so-called community detection algorithms are most appropriate for the structures they are studying and the questions they are asking. Here we show that different methods highlight different aspects of a network's structure and that the the sort of information that we seek to extract about the system must guide us in our decision. For example, many community detection algorithms, including the popular modularity maximization approach, infer module assignments from an underlying model of the network formation process. However, we are not always as interested in how a system's network structure was formed, as we are in how a network's extant structure influences the system's behavior. To see how structure influences current behavior, we will recognize that links in a network induce movement across the network and result in system-wide interdependence. In doing so, we ex

5 nodes4 linksoverview mapThe map equation
5 nodes4 links
The map equation5 visible / 5 total nodes / 7 links
Co-authorshipCo-authorshipCo-authorshipAuthorshipAuthorshipAuthorshipTopic signalWThe map equationpreprint / 2009AM. RosvallResearcherAD. AxelssonResearcherAC. T. BergstromResearcherTphysics.soc-ph3139 works
PaperSignal 104 links

The map equation

preprint / 2009

Open