Graph explorer

Syntactic Phylogenetic Trees

In this paper we identify several serious problems that arise in the use of syntactic data from the SSWL database for the purpose of computational phylogenetic reconstruction. We show that the most naive approach fails to produce reliable linguistic phylogenetic trees. We identify some of the sources of the observed problems and we discuss how they may be, at least partly, corrected by using additional information, such as prior subdivision into language families and subfamilies, and a better use of the information about ancient languages. We also describe how the use of phylogenetic algebraic geometry can help in estimating to what extent the probability distribution at the leaves of the phylogenetic tree obtained from the SSWL data can be considered reliable, by testing it on phylogenetic trees established by other forms of linguistic analysis. In simple examples, we find that, after restricting to smaller language subfamilies and considering only those SSWL parameters that are fully mapped for the whole subfamily, the SSWL data match extremely well reliable phylogenetic trees, according to the evaluation of phylogenetic invariants. This is a promising sign for the use of SSWL da

7 nodes6 linksoverview mapSyntactic Phylogenetic Trees
7 nodes6 links
Syntactic Phylogenetic Trees7 visible / 7 total nodes / 16 links
Co-authorshipCo-authorshipCo-authorshipCo-authorshipCo-authorshipCo-authorshipCo-authorshipCo-authorshipCo-authorshipCo-authorshipAuthorshipAuthorshipAuthorshipAuthorshipTopic signalAuthorshipWSyntactic Phylogenetic Treespreprint / 2016AKevin ShuResearcherASharjeel AzizResearcherAVy-Luan HuynhResearcherADavid WarrickResearcherTComputation and Language14115 worksAMatilde MarcolliResearcher
PaperSignal 106 links

Syntactic Phylogenetic Trees

preprint / 2016

Open