BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Graph explorer

Shrinkage Confidence Procedures

The possibility of improving on the usual multivariate normal confidence was first discussed in Stein (1962). Using the ideas of shrinkage, through Bayesian and empirical Bayesian arguments, domination results, both analytic and numerical, have been obtained. Here we trace some of the developments in confidence set estimation.

4 nodes3 linksoverview previewShrinkage Confidence Procedures
SearchCollections
4 nodes3 links
Shrinkage Confidence Procedures4 visible / 4 total nodes / 4 links
Co-authorshipAuthorshipAuthorshipTopic signalWShrinkage Confidence Procedurespreprint / 2012AGeorge CasellaResearcherAJ. T. Gene HwangResearcherTMethodology5119 works
PaperSignal 103 links

Shrinkage Confidence Procedures

preprint / 2012

Open

Personal maps

Sign in to save graph views

Saved views keep the query, focus and filters attached to this map.

Sign in

Public snapshots

1 shared view(s)