Graph explorer

Sampling versus Blocking

The idea of blocking in configuration space has played an important role in the development of the RG ideas. However, despite being half a century old and having had a huge intellectual impact, generic numerical methods to perform blocking for lattice models have progressed more slowly than sampling methods. Blocking may be essential to deal with near conformal situations. Typically, blocking methods have smaller statistical errors but larger systematic errors than sampling methods. This situation is evolving with recent developments based on the Tensor RG (TRG) method. We report recent results for spin and gauge lattice models obtained with this new method regarding searches for fixed points, calculations of critical exponents and resolutions of sign problems. An interesting model for comparison is the 2-dimensional O(2) model with a chemical potential which has a sign problem with conventional Monte Carlo but allows sampling with the worm algorithm and blocking with various TRG formulations. We compare the efficiency and accuracy of these two methods.

9 nodes9 linksoverview mapSampling versus Blocking
9 nodes9 links
Sampling versus Blocking9 visible / 9 total nodes / 19 links
Co-authorshipCo-authorshipCo-authorshipCo-authorshipCo-authorshipCo-authorshipCo-authorshipCo-authorshipCo-authorshipCo-authorshipAuthorshipAuthorshipAuthorshipAuthorshipTopic signalTopic signalTopic signalRelated contextAuthorshipWSampling versus Blockingpreprint / 2014AYannick MeuriceResearcherAYuzhi LiuResearcherAJudah Unmuth-YockeyResearcherALi-Ping YangResearcherThep-th13268 worksTcond-mat.stat-mech6570 worksThep-lat1839 worksAHaiyuan ZouResearcher
PaperSignal 108 links

Sampling versus Blocking

preprint / 2014

Open