Graph explorer

Reconsidering Written Language

A number of elite thinkers in Europe during the 16th and 17th centuries pursued an agenda which historian Paolo Rossi calls the "quest for a universal language," a quest which was deeply interwoven with the emergence of the scientific method. From a modern perspective, one of the many surprising aspects of these efforts is that they relied on a diverse array of memorization techniques as foundational elements. In the case of Leibniz's universal calculus, the ultimate vision was to create a pictorial language that could be learned by anyone in a matter of weeks and which would contain within it a symbolic representation of all domains of contemporary thought, ranging from the natural sciences, to theology, to law. In this brief article, I explore why this agenda might have been appealing to thinkers of this era by examining ancient and modern memory feats. As a thought experiment, I suggest that a society built entirely upon memorization might be less limited than we might otherwise imagine, and furthermore, that cultural norms discouraging the use of written language might have had implications for the development of scientific methodology. Viewed in this light, the eff

3 nodes2 linksoverview mapReconsidering Written Language
3 nodes2 links
Reconsidering Written Language3 visible / 3 total nodes / 2 links
AuthorshipTopic signalWReconsidering Written Languagepreprint / 2015AGopal SarmaResearcherTphysics.hist-ph641 works
PaperSignal 102 links

Reconsidering Written Language

preprint / 2015

Open