BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Graph explorer

Ranking scientists

Currently the ranking of scientists is based on the $h$-index, which is widely perceived as an imprecise and simplistic though still useful metric. We find that the $h$-index actually favours modestly performing researchers and propose a simple criterion for proper ranking.

5 nodes5 linksoverview mapRanking scientists
SearchCollections
5 nodes5 links
Ranking scientists5 visible / 5 total nodes / 6 links
Co-authorshipAuthorshipAuthorshipTopic signalTopic signalRelated contextWRanking scientistspreprint / 2015AS. N. DorogovtsevResearcherAJ. F. F. MendesResearcherTphysics.soc-ph3139 worksTDigital Libraries719 works
PaperSignal 104 links

Ranking scientists

preprint / 2015

Open

Personal maps

Sign in to save graph views

Saved views keep the query, focus and filters attached so you can return to the same research slice later.

Sign in

Public snapshots

1 shared view(s)