Graph explorer

Proportional Rankings

In this paper we extend the principle of proportional representation to rankings. We consider the setting where alternatives need to be ranked based on approval preferences. In this setting, proportional representation requires that cohesive groups of voters are represented proportionally in each initial segment of the ranking. Proportional rankings are desirable in situations where initial segments of different lengths may be relevant, e.g., hiring decisions (if it is unclear how many positions are to be filled), the presentation of competing proposals on a liquid democracy platform (if it is unclear how many proposals participants are taking into consideration), or recommender systems (if a ranking has to accommodate different user types). We study the proportional representation provided by several ranking methods and prove theoretical guarantees. Furthermore, we experimentally evaluate these methods and present preliminary evidence as to which methods are most suitable for producing proportional rankings.

9 nodes11 linksoverview mapProportional Rankings
9 nodes11 links
Proportional Rankings9 visible / 9 total nodes / 21 links
Related contextRelated contextRelated contextCo-authorshipCo-authorshipCo-authorshipCo-authorshipCo-authorshipCo-authorshipCo-authorshipCo-authorshipCo-authorshipCo-authorshipAuthorshipAuthorshipAuthorshipAuthorshipTopic signalTopic signalTopic signalAuthorshipWProportional Rankingspreprint / 2016APiotr SkowronResearcherAMartin LacknerResearcherAMarkus BrillResearcherADominik PetersResearcherTArtificial Intelligence22915 worksTMultiagent Systems1840 worksTComputer Science and Ga...1864 worksAEdith ElkindResearcher
PaperSignal 108 links

Proportional Rankings

preprint / 2016

Open